SCIENCE & EVIDENCE

Confidence begins
with a clear basis.

Clinical decision support should make its reasoning easier to examine. Our focus is structured information, visible sources and meaningful clinician feedback.

OUR EVIDENCE APPROACH

From clinical references
to a usable workflow.

Organising guidance is only part of the work. Understanding where it applies, where it does not, and how clinicians use it matters just as much.

01

Reference-led information

Clinical source material informs the content; the platform provides access to guidelines and references for independent review.

02

Context-aware pathways

Structured inputs bring relevant patient and procedure factors into a repeatable review process.

03

Ongoing evaluation

Usability feedback and clinical review guide refinement. Clinical effectiveness requires appropriately designed evaluation.

PROGRESS, WITH CONTEXT

What the evidence
currently tells us.

The following reflects the team’s February 2026 progress report. Development and commercial milestones are distinct from measured clinical outcomes.

AreaDocumented progressWhat it demonstrates
Product developmentv4.16 interface and expanded bleeding workflowContinued product maturation
Physician engagementCanadian and international clinical feedbackEarly relevance and usability signals
Hospital engagementPaid agreement with Nikan Hospital Group in IranEarly commercial validation
Clinical outcomesNo comparative outcome results presented hereA priority for future evaluation
EVALUATION PRIORITIES

Measure what matters
in clinical practice.

Planned evaluation focus

Guideline concordance

Review pathway outputs against the selected clinical references using defined case scenarios.

Time & usability

Assess how clinicians navigate the workflow, locate information and complete a structured review.

Real-world fit

Understand clinical governance, workflow requirements and implementation barriers across care settings.

SELECTED CLINICAL RESOURCES

Keep the source
within reach.

External references are provided for education. Their inclusion does not imply endorsement of Anticoag360+.

A curated educational reading list, not a complete inventory of the application’s embedded references.

Intended use & Canadian readiness

Anticoag360+ is presented as an informational support tool for healthcare professionals. Canadian classification, clinical claims and deployment requirements must be assessed against the applicable rules and final intended use. This website does not claim Health Canada approval, an exemption determination, or completed Canadian clinical deployment.

Read Health Canada’s software guidance
LET’S CONNECT

Bring clarity to your next conversation.

Explore the platform with our team, share clinical feedback, or discuss a research or institutional collaboration.

Start a conversation