A clinician-facing platform that organises anticoagulation guidance around the questions encountered in practice.
Anticoag360+ is designed to support an informational review. It does not autonomously diagnose, prescribe or initiate treatment.
Watch the demoStart with the clinical question: administration, a procedure, an interaction or bleeding.
Work through the clinical inputs appropriate to the selected module.
Consider the information and source references in the context of the patient.
The treating clinician verifies applicability and determines the next clinical step.
Bring the clinical indication, patient characteristics, organ function and current medicines into a guided review of anticoagulant selection and dosing considerations.
Make the information behind a treatment decision easier to review.Organize the factors relevant to interruption, bridging considerations and resumption: the procedure, anticoagulant, patient characteristics and competing bleeding and thrombotic risks.
Support a coherent plan across the peri-procedural journey.Use an interaction-focused workflow to consider concomitant medicines alongside anticoagulation therapy, with a reference pathway that supports independent clinical review.
Bring medication-related questions into the same clinical conversation.The v4.16 demonstration includes structured inputs, bleeding-severity branches and post-bleeding considerations. The treating clinician remains responsible for urgency, interpretation and action.
Make the stages of a complex review visible and repeatable.The current product focuses on standalone workflow support. Enterprise capabilities are part of the development conversation.
Separate clinical pathways keep a focused question at the centre of each interaction. The current release includes four core modules and a references area.
The platform includes Guidelines and References so clinicians can examine the basis for the information. Source visibility is a core development priority.
Standalone use is the starting point. EHR connectivity, SSO, institutional security requirements and deployment arrangements must be evaluated with each organisation.
Interested in institutional evaluation? Share your workflow, clinical governance and technical requirements. The team can discuss current capabilities and development priorities.
More to discuss? We would like to hear from you.
Get in touchHealthcare professionals involved in anticoagulation decisions, including physicians and clinical teams in primary care, cardiology, anaesthesia, perioperative care and other relevant settings.
No. It organises clinical information and references for professional review. The treating clinician remains responsible for diagnosis, prescribing, interpretation and patient care.
The supplied v4.16 video shows the application dashboard and a walkthrough of the bleeding-on-NOAC workflow, including clinical inputs, severity-based pathways and post-bleeding considerations.
The February 2026 progress report describes Canadian market preparation and clinician engagement. Contact the team for current availability, evaluation arrangements and intended-use information. This website makes no claim of Canadian regulatory approval.
EHR connectivity, single sign-on and other enterprise integration options are areas for evaluation. They are not presented here as completed integrations. Tell us about your workflow and technical requirements.
No. The contact form is for professional and business enquiries. Do not include patient names, identifiers, records or other sensitive health information.
Yes. Use the language control at the top to switch between English and Persian, including the knowledge hub. The supplied app recording remains in its original language.
Explore the platform with our team, share clinical feedback, or discuss a research or institutional collaboration.